| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
khaibar
Advanced
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 1141
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:20 am Post subject: #20 - Zedus Beacon gives PUs (Added) |
 |
|
Files: process_turn.php
insert on line 1172
| Code: | switch(intval(($planet_maxturn - $relic->i_turn_captured)/10))
{
case 0:
case 1:
case 2: $zedusloot = array(164,144,146,161,147,179,145); // Give simple PU
break;
case 3:
case 4:
case 5: $zedusloot = array(163,151,148,149,150,166); // Give inter PU
break;
case 6: $zedusloot = array(162,155,165,152,153,154); // Give adv PU
break;
default: $zedusloot = array(160,159,156,157,158,154,155,165); // Give elite PU or adv merit related PU <-- most important ones really
}
$zedus_mod= $zedusloot[(array_rand($zedusloot))];
SetMessage(0, "<font class='alerttextb'>Captured Beacon provides <b>".$TW_mod_names[$zedus_mod]."</b> mod!", $relicdata->i_owner );
$sql = "UPDATE mods SET m_".$zedus_mod."=(m_".$zedus_mod."+1) WHERE user_id=? ";
$res =& $db->query($sql, Array($relicdata->i_owner) );
if (DB::isError($res)) { ReportDBError($res); }
unset($sql,$zedus_mod,$zedusloot);
|
i cloned the swarm PU salvage so I hope no errors
Basic idea, on horizon the owner of the beacon gets:
if beacon held for <30 turns: simple PU
if less than 60 turns: inter PU
if less than 70 turns :adv PU
if more: elite pu or adv pu related to merits
Fps are dead, this would cause people to drop for beacons for personal profit
I never did zedus beacons. But I would if this is added
PU is given with fps not instead of them
Ticket link: https://sourceforge.net/p/dropshock/tickets/20/
Last edited by khaibar on Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:46 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yoman5
Advanced
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 754
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
support, a reason to zedus fight again would be cool, i always enjoyed dueling
_________________
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vinzkillx
Simple
Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 92
Location: Behind you
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agree will be more profit than hundred of Fp
_________________
In game called DevilSteam
one day at PR fac chat ...
DevilSteam [12:11am 19]
But we're all reds
Tirptiz [12:10am 19]
and go to WAAAAAARRRR, all reds must die |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xian
Intermediate
Joined: 23 Oct 2008
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
would make Zedus more active, agreed.
_________________
xian in-game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
snorok14
Advanced
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 870
Location: Leave me alone, your mom and I are busy.
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A nice bonus to factions that need help because they cannot afford to pay beaconers as much. Support.
_________________
_D'z Nutz
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
corclaork
Council Member
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 519
Location: The Mohawk Wasteland
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
support only if its along side the FP payout.. ppl still use zed for fp
cor
_________________
Contact Email: calaclark@gmail.com
in game name : corclark
Sacred_Tribune out in the wild. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinuss
Intermediate
Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 423
Location: Australia/China
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice idea, support
_________________
'Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ravneel
Intermediate
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 319
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
support!
_________________
Blair [7:29pm]
I see my ass and it looks like your face 
Darkc35ar [7:27pm]
look in da mirror and ull get owned =P
Blair [7:25pm]
owned
Darkc35ar [7:23pm]
omfg wrong chat xD
Darkc35ar [7:23pm]
woot 1.4k shak exp so far |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Walterohdim
Site Admin
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1629
Location: Somewhere with lots of doors
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like this idea also. AuX has been paying 5cmd for faction points but even with the payout it is hard to get people to work that planet. I think this sort of built in incentive might be just what we need so that Zedus isn't just FP farming and actually becomes something that is worth fighting over.
Walterohdim
_________________
Wannabee historian of Tinywarz. Through the building of myth we will build community. M. Scott Peck
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DesertFox
Simple
Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 37
Location: Io
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| support... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khaibar
Advanced
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 1141
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
bumping for council
given all the positive feedback i think this should be priority |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Walterohdim
Site Admin
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1629
Location: Somewhere with lots of doors
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the circle email I have seen that this idea has some resistance from council members, who don't like the PU idea. I still like this idea though as Zedus needs more then just faction points in order to make the beacons worth fighting over. I vote yes on this idea.
Walterohdim
_________________
Wannabee historian of Tinywarz. Through the building of myth we will build community. M. Scott Peck
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark Leth
Council Member
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 1498
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another suggestion was that perhaps allowing users to continue their command missions to chain the command rewards. If the command mission can continue indefinitely, I suggest that for each supply capture (should the player decide to continue) an additional status message is pushed to all chat. Something along the lines of "[Player X] has continued their Rynn mission to gain an additional [Y] command!" so that fellow players are aware that someone is still deployed and to encourage combat.
Regarding the actual suggestion, I'm in favor of utilizing either FP or command increases, although the latter might be more useful for the game in its current state. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khaibar
Advanced
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 1141
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Walterohdim wrote: | In the circle email I have seen that this idea has some resistance from council members, who don't like the PU idea. I still like this idea though as Zedus needs more then just faction points in order to make the beacons worth fighting over. I vote yes on this idea.
Walterohdim |
Who? I keel them!
| Dark Leth wrote: | Another suggestion was that perhaps allowing users to continue their command missions to chain the command rewards. If the command mission can continue indefinitely, I suggest that for each supply capture (should the player decide to continue) an additional status message is pushed to all chat. Something along the lines of "[Player X] has continued their Rynn mission to gain an additional [Y] command!" so that fellow players are aware that someone is still deployed and to encourage combat.
Regarding the actual suggestion, I'm in favor of utilizing either FP or command increases, although the latter might be more useful for the game in its current state. |
This is not related to PU suggestion 8( |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark Leth
Council Member
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 1498
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| khaibar wrote: | | Walterohdim wrote: | In the circle email I have seen that this idea has some resistance from council members, who don't like the PU idea. I still like this idea though as Zedus needs more then just faction points in order to make the beacons worth fighting over. I vote yes on this idea.
Walterohdim |
Who? I keel them!
| Dark Leth wrote: | Another suggestion was that perhaps allowing users to continue their command missions to chain the command rewards. If the command mission can continue indefinitely, I suggest that for each supply capture (should the player decide to continue) an additional status message is pushed to all chat. Something along the lines of "[Player X] has continued their Rynn mission to gain an additional [Y] command!" so that fellow players are aware that someone is still deployed and to encourage combat.
Regarding the actual suggestion, I'm in favor of utilizing either FP or command increases, although the latter might be more useful for the game in its current state. |
This is not related to PU suggestion 8( |
I think I got my tabs out of order, sorry.
Here's my thoughts on the Zedus session:
Dropping PUs is not an ideal solution to achieving a more active planet.
I really don't want to see more aggregate deployments to Zedus if all that means is just more people deploying by themselves and holding a beacon until cycle for PUs.
However, if PUs were an inducement for others to drop - for example, beacons dropped PUs only when the beacon was contested by, say, 3 or more players, this might be worth pursuing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
